https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162591 The Madras High Court directed the Deputy Commissioner to re-consider a case involving the detention of goods under a goods detention order. The court found that the petitioner had submitted the required compounding order, which should have been considered by the authorities. Emphasizing the need for fairness in disposal of cases, the court held that the Deputy Commissioner's refusal to re-hear the matter was not legally sustainable. The court cited a Supreme Court judgment to support the principle that every order by a quasi-judicial officer can be reviewed if necessary. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction for re-consideration by the Deputy Commissioner, without awarding costs. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:52:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162591 The Madras High Court directed the Deputy Commissioner to re-consider a case involving the detention of goods under a goods detention order. The court found that the petitioner had submitted the required compounding order, which should have been considered by the authorities. Emphasizing the need for fairness in disposal of cases, the court held that the Deputy Commissioner's refusal to re-hear the matter was not legally sustainable. The court cited a Supreme Court judgment to support the principle that every order by a quasi-judicial officer can be reviewed if necessary. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction for re-consideration by the Deputy Commissioner, without awarding costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162591