<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 571 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162585</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee in a revision petition concerning the interpretation of registration certificate terms under the CST Act. It held that the lathe machine used for repairing and molding parts of main machinery fell within the scope of &quot;machinery and their parts&quot; as per the certificate. The court emphasized the practical utility and purpose of the machinery, allowing the concessional rate purchase against form C declaration. Additionally, the court set aside the penalty imposed under section 10A of the CST Act, citing errors in its imposition and relevant case law supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 571 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162585</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee in a revision petition concerning the interpretation of registration certificate terms under the CST Act. It held that the lathe machine used for repairing and molding parts of main machinery fell within the scope of &quot;machinery and their parts&quot; as per the certificate. The court emphasized the practical utility and purpose of the machinery, allowing the concessional rate purchase against form C declaration. Additionally, the court set aside the penalty imposed under section 10A of the CST Act, citing errors in its imposition and relevant case law supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>