<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 586 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162580</link>
    <description>Refund under section 41(1) of the Punjab VAT Act can be withheld only if the refund order is under appeal or another pending proceeding, and the competent officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, records a reasoned satisfaction on relevant material that immediate release is likely to prejudice recovery. A pending special leave petition against a different judgment did not make the assessment order granting refund a subject of appeal or pending proceedings, and no supporting material showed likely harm to revenue recovery. The withholding was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the refund with statutory interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:59:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 586 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162580</link>
      <description>Refund under section 41(1) of the Punjab VAT Act can be withheld only if the refund order is under appeal or another pending proceeding, and the competent officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, records a reasoned satisfaction on relevant material that immediate release is likely to prejudice recovery. A pending special leave petition against a different judgment did not make the assessment order granting refund a subject of appeal or pending proceedings, and no supporting material showed likely harm to revenue recovery. The withholding was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the refund with statutory interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>