<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 503 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162575</link>
    <description>The Industrial Policy, 1986 incentives could not override the Assam Industries (Sales Tax Concessions) Act, 1986, because the statute did not create a corresponding enforceable right to sales tax exemption. Promissory estoppel therefore could not be invoked against the statute to compel concession under the policy. The controversy was also already covered by an earlier Division Bench ruling rejecting the same estoppel claim, and the court found no reason to depart from that view. The exemption claim accordingly failed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 503 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162575</link>
      <description>The Industrial Policy, 1986 incentives could not override the Assam Industries (Sales Tax Concessions) Act, 1986, because the statute did not create a corresponding enforceable right to sales tax exemption. Promissory estoppel therefore could not be invoked against the statute to compel concession under the policy. The controversy was also already covered by an earlier Division Bench ruling rejecting the same estoppel claim, and the court found no reason to depart from that view. The exemption claim accordingly failed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>