<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 333 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal approved the change in the method of valuation by the assessee, citing accounting principles and legal precedents. It emphasized the need for consistency in valuation methods for opening and closing stock to ensure accurate profit determination. The matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for a decision on adjusting the opening stock valuation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 07:01:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 333 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal approved the change in the method of valuation by the assessee, citing accounting principles and legal precedents. It emphasized the need for consistency in valuation methods for opening and closing stock to ensure accurate profit determination. The matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for a decision on adjusting the opening stock valuation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>