<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the revision order under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 2009-10. It held that the assessing officer&#039;s view on the applicability of section 80P(4) was reasonable and legally supported, as the assessee was not a cooperative bank. The Tribunal emphasized that if two views are possible and the AO&#039;s view is not legally unsustainable, it cannot be deemed erroneous. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the revision order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 07:00:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the revision order under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 2009-10. It held that the assessing officer&#039;s view on the applicability of section 80P(4) was reasonable and legally supported, as the assessee was not a cooperative bank. The Tribunal emphasized that if two views are possible and the AO&#039;s view is not legally unsustainable, it cannot be deemed erroneous. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the revision order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>