<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 313 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244858</link>
    <description>The appeal was admitted by the appellate tribunal based on a previous High Court judgment. The appellant&#039;s input service credit on Goods Transport Agency service was allowed up to March 31, 2008, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 06:52:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 313 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244858</link>
      <description>The appeal was admitted by the appellate tribunal based on a previous High Court judgment. The appellant&#039;s input service credit on Goods Transport Agency service was allowed up to March 31, 2008, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>