<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 310 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244855</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for reversal of credit on capital goods. The decision was based on previous judgments affirming that credit is allowed on reversal of transaction value upon clearance of capital goods after use. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 06:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 310 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244855</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for reversal of credit on capital goods. The decision was based on previous judgments affirming that credit is allowed on reversal of transaction value upon clearance of capital goods after use. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>