<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 11AC Not Applicable Without Both &quot;Intention&quot; and &quot;Evasion&quot; in Central Excise Act Cases.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17649</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 11AC - there is no rigorous against the appellant when “intention” and “evasion” are companion of each other to speak for themselves as to their association to cause prejudice to Revenue. Absence of one does not make the other to stand. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:48:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:48:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 11AC Not Applicable Without Both &quot;Intention&quot; and &quot;Evasion&quot; in Central Excise Act Cases.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17649</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 11AC - there is no rigorous against the appellant when “intention” and “evasion” are companion of each other to speak for themselves as to their association to cause prejudice to Revenue. Absence of one does not make the other to stand. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:48:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>