<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 305 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244850</link>
    <description>A transaction is liable to levy as a transfer of the right to use goods only where the transferee obtains effective dominion and the legal right to use the goods; mere physical possession is insufficient. On the facts, the equipment was deployed with the respondent&#039;s specialised personnel, no one other than its staff could access or operate it independently, and effective control remained with the respondent. The transactions were therefore characterised as services rather than a taxable transfer of the right to use goods, so Section 3-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was not attracted and the levy failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 305 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244850</link>
      <description>A transaction is liable to levy as a transfer of the right to use goods only where the transferee obtains effective dominion and the legal right to use the goods; mere physical possession is insufficient. On the facts, the equipment was deployed with the respondent&#039;s specialised personnel, no one other than its staff could access or operate it independently, and effective control remained with the respondent. The transactions were therefore characterised as services rather than a taxable transfer of the right to use goods, so Section 3-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was not attracted and the levy failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>