<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244832</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b). The tribunal found valid reasons for the appellant&#039;s non-appearance on specified dates, including the AR being out of Mumbai for a legitimate purpose and suffering from an illness. The judgment stressed the significance of providing a reasonable opportunity to be heard and considering legitimate reasons before levying penalties in income tax cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244832</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b). The tribunal found valid reasons for the appellant&#039;s non-appearance on specified dates, including the AR being out of Mumbai for a legitimate purpose and suffering from an illness. The judgment stressed the significance of providing a reasonable opportunity to be heard and considering legitimate reasons before levying penalties in income tax cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>