<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 286 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244831</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to bona fide reasons. The disallowance under section 14A was addressed, with Rule 8D deemed inapplicable for the Assessment Year 2007-08. The denial of liability for penal interest under various sections was considered consequential, not requiring separate adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:27:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 286 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244831</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to bona fide reasons. The disallowance under section 14A was addressed, with Rule 8D deemed inapplicable for the Assessment Year 2007-08. The denial of liability for penal interest under various sections was considered consequential, not requiring separate adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>