https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244828 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA licence, ruling in favor of the appellant. It was determined that the appellant had not sublet their licence as all clearances were handled by their authorized employee, and they had proper authorization from exporters. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant fulfilled their obligations and was not liable for penal action, ultimately finding the charges unsustainable. As a result, the CHA licence was reinstated with immediate effect. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:26:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244828 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA licence, ruling in favor of the appellant. It was determined that the appellant had not sublet their licence as all clearances were handled by their authorized employee, and they had proper authorization from exporters. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant fulfilled their obligations and was not liable for penal action, ultimately finding the charges unsustainable. As a result, the CHA licence was reinstated with immediate effect. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244828