https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244815 The Tribunal found that the appellant's activity did not amount to manufacture but could potentially be eligible for exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for further consideration on the applicability of the exemption, directing specific findings on the matter. Consequently, the appeal was allowed through remand, and the stay application was disposed of. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Mar 2014 06:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244815 The Tribunal found that the appellant's activity did not amount to manufacture but could potentially be eligible for exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for further consideration on the applicability of the exemption, directing specific findings on the matter. Consequently, the appeal was allowed through remand, and the stay application was disposed of. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244815