<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 265 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244810</link>
    <description>Transfer of technical know-how, patents, trade secrets and related technical information under a licence to manufacture, sell, distribute and use a product in India was held to be outside Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service. The arrangement involved transfer of know-how for lump sum consideration and royalty, which is distinct from advice, consultancy or technical assistance in the field of engineering. On that basis, the activity was not taxable as Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. Earlier Tribunal rulings, including one affirmed by the Karnataka High Court, were followed in reaching the same conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 06:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 265 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244810</link>
      <description>Transfer of technical know-how, patents, trade secrets and related technical information under a licence to manufacture, sell, distribute and use a product in India was held to be outside Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service. The arrangement involved transfer of know-how for lump sum consideration and royalty, which is distinct from advice, consultancy or technical assistance in the field of engineering. On that basis, the activity was not taxable as Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. Earlier Tribunal rulings, including one affirmed by the Karnataka High Court, were followed in reaching the same conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>