<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 245 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to a refund based on a subsequent clarificatory notification and consistent government policy exempting barges from Additional Duty of Customs (SAD). The Tribunal held that the respondent was not required to file an appeal against the assessment order to claim a refund, as there was no dispute at the time of duty payment. The decision was pronounced in open court, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order without any infirmity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 05:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 245 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to a refund based on a subsequent clarificatory notification and consistent government policy exempting barges from Additional Duty of Customs (SAD). The Tribunal held that the respondent was not required to file an appeal against the assessment order to claim a refund, as there was no dispute at the time of duty payment. The decision was pronounced in open court, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order without any infirmity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>