<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 239 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244783</link>
    <description>Cenvat/Modvat credit on roller bearings could not be denied merely because the invoice omitted certain particulars, where the goods were received under invoices and duty payment was otherwise evidenced. The Tribunal treated the missing invoice details as a rectifiable procedural defect, especially since the assessee produced an additional certificate supplying the omitted information. As the substantive conditions for credit were shown to be satisfied, the defect in documentation did not justify denial of credit. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 239 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244783</link>
      <description>Cenvat/Modvat credit on roller bearings could not be denied merely because the invoice omitted certain particulars, where the goods were received under invoices and duty payment was otherwise evidenced. The Tribunal treated the missing invoice details as a rectifiable procedural defect, especially since the assessee produced an additional certificate supplying the omitted information. As the substantive conditions for credit were shown to be satisfied, the defect in documentation did not justify denial of credit. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>