<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 233 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244777</link>
    <description>Belts sold as accessories of textile machinery were classified as parts and accessories of machinery rather than under the specific rubber-products entry. The Madras HC note states that the rubber entry covered conveyor, transmission or elevator belts of rubber, including those combined with textile material, but remained a specific entry for rubber products. By contrast, the machinery entry expressly covered machinery and its parts and accessories. Applying the rule that a specific entry for the actual goods prevails over a more general entry based on composition, the belts were treated as eligible for concessional tax as textile machinery accessories, and the tax revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 233 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244777</link>
      <description>Belts sold as accessories of textile machinery were classified as parts and accessories of machinery rather than under the specific rubber-products entry. The Madras HC note states that the rubber entry covered conveyor, transmission or elevator belts of rubber, including those combined with textile material, but remained a specific entry for rubber products. By contrast, the machinery entry expressly covered machinery and its parts and accessories. Applying the rule that a specific entry for the actual goods prevails over a more general entry based on composition, the belts were treated as eligible for concessional tax as textile machinery accessories, and the tax revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>