https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244769 A party that participates in arbitral proceedings without timely objecting to the tribunal's constitution or jurisdiction waives that objection under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court noted that the sole arbitrator was appointed under Section 11(6), yet the appellant did not challenge the appointment at the relevant stage, filed a defence, led evidence, and raised a counterclaim without pleading any jurisdictional defect. Applying Sections 16(2) and 4, the Court held that such objections must be raised no later than the statement of defence and are lost if a party proceeds without protest. The jurisdictional challenge was therefore rejected and the award stood. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Mar 2014 08:02:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244769 A party that participates in arbitral proceedings without timely objecting to the tribunal's constitution or jurisdiction waives that objection under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court noted that the sole arbitrator was appointed under Section 11(6), yet the appellant did not challenge the appointment at the relevant stage, filed a defence, led evidence, and raised a counterclaim without pleading any jurisdictional defect. Applying Sections 16(2) and 4, the Court held that such objections must be raised no later than the statement of defence and are lost if a party proceeds without protest. The jurisdictional challenge was therefore rejected and the award stood. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244769