<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 221 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244765</link>
    <description>The appeals related to income tax quantum and penalty levy under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1999-2000 were considered by the Tribunal. The primary issue was the validity of notice service under Sections 148/142(1) and 143(2) of the Act, with the Tribunal ruling the service invalid. Additionally, the Tribunal quashed the AO&#039;s order on the assessee&#039;s capital gain tax liability, questioning jurisdiction and ordering a fresh assessment. Despite procedural errors, the judgment emphasized the assessee&#039;s tax liability on capital gains and directed a fresh assessment by the Income Tax Officer at Kapurthala.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 221 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244765</link>
      <description>The appeals related to income tax quantum and penalty levy under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1999-2000 were considered by the Tribunal. The primary issue was the validity of notice service under Sections 148/142(1) and 143(2) of the Act, with the Tribunal ruling the service invalid. Additionally, the Tribunal quashed the AO&#039;s order on the assessee&#039;s capital gain tax liability, questioning jurisdiction and ordering a fresh assessment. Despite procedural errors, the judgment emphasized the assessee&#039;s tax liability on capital gains and directed a fresh assessment by the Income Tax Officer at Kapurthala.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>