<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 220 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244764</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the assessment year 2008-09, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s prima facie belief of income escapement as sufficient for issuing notices, with detailed examination left for reassessment proceedings. It clarified the distinction between a change of opinion and valid reasons for reassessment, highlighting the importance of tangible grounds for believing income has escaped assessment. The decision underlines procedural requirements and jurisdictional aspects governing assessment reopening under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 220 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244764</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the assessment year 2008-09, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s prima facie belief of income escapement as sufficient for issuing notices, with detailed examination left for reassessment proceedings. It clarified the distinction between a change of opinion and valid reasons for reassessment, highlighting the importance of tangible grounds for believing income has escaped assessment. The decision underlines procedural requirements and jurisdictional aspects governing assessment reopening under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>