<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 219 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244763</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Assessment Order and Notice of Demand, ruling in favor of the petitioner, a private limited company, allowing it to claim exemption under sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on its share of profit from the partnership firm. The court upheld the validity of the explanation to sub-section (2A), emphasizing the prevention of double taxation and equality in tax treatment for partners of a firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 219 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244763</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Assessment Order and Notice of Demand, ruling in favor of the petitioner, a private limited company, allowing it to claim exemption under sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on its share of profit from the partnership firm. The court upheld the validity of the explanation to sub-section (2A), emphasizing the prevention of double taxation and equality in tax treatment for partners of a firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>