<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 218 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244762</link>
    <description>Cash receipts treated as loans in the books were found, on the facts, to be accepted in contravention of Section 269SS because they were received otherwise than by account payee cheque or bank draft. The explanation that the sums were capital contributions from proposed partners was rejected as not genuine, and the assessee failed to establish reasonable cause to avoid penalty. On that factual foundation, the penalty under Section 271DD was sustained, and there was no basis to interfere with the concurrent findings as they were neither perverse nor illegal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 218 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244762</link>
      <description>Cash receipts treated as loans in the books were found, on the facts, to be accepted in contravention of Section 269SS because they were received otherwise than by account payee cheque or bank draft. The explanation that the sums were capital contributions from proposed partners was rejected as not genuine, and the assessee failed to establish reasonable cause to avoid penalty. On that factual foundation, the penalty under Section 271DD was sustained, and there was no basis to interfere with the concurrent findings as they were neither perverse nor illegal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>