<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 212 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244756</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, holding that interest-bearing funds were not used for acquiring mutual funds. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues and upheld the higher depreciation rate of 60% on computer accessories and peripherals, in line with the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision. The order was pronounced on 28-2-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 08:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 212 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244756</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, holding that interest-bearing funds were not used for acquiring mutual funds. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues and upheld the higher depreciation rate of 60% on computer accessories and peripherals, in line with the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision. The order was pronounced on 28-2-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>