<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 200 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244744</link>
    <description>Unaccounted finished goods found in the factory, where the RG-1 register had been updated only to an earlier date and showed nil balance, constituted a breach of the duty to maintain a daily account of finished goods. On that basis, confiscation under Rule 25(1)(a) was treated as justified and penalty was attracted for non-entry in the statutory stock register. The confiscation was upheld and the penalty was sustained in principle, although the penalty amount was reduced in view of the overall facts and circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:32:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=348000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 200 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244744</link>
      <description>Unaccounted finished goods found in the factory, where the RG-1 register had been updated only to an earlier date and showed nil balance, constituted a breach of the duty to maintain a daily account of finished goods. On that basis, confiscation under Rule 25(1)(a) was treated as justified and penalty was attracted for non-entry in the statutory stock register. The confiscation was upheld and the penalty was sustained in principle, although the penalty amount was reduced in view of the overall facts and circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>