<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 188 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application seeking condonation of a 317-day delay in filing the appeal, found the appeal not maintainable prima facie, and directed the appellant to predeposit the penalty amount within six weeks. The penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act 1994 was upheld, with the Tribunal deeming Section 80 inapplicable and rejecting the waiver and stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 06:51:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 188 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application seeking condonation of a 317-day delay in filing the appeal, found the appeal not maintainable prima facie, and directed the appellant to predeposit the penalty amount within six weeks. The penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act 1994 was upheld, with the Tribunal deeming Section 80 inapplicable and rejecting the waiver and stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>