<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 181 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244725</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling against the appellant/assessee on all substantial questions of law raised. The judgment emphasized the importance of fulfilling contractual obligations, payment terms, and legal rights acquisition in property transactions to determine the appropriate classification of capital gains for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 181 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244725</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling against the appellant/assessee on all substantial questions of law raised. The judgment emphasized the importance of fulfilling contractual obligations, payment terms, and legal rights acquisition in property transactions to determine the appropriate classification of capital gains for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>