<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 180 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the proviso to section 147 could only be invoked if the assessment was reopened after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. As the assessment in this case was reopened within four years, the proviso did not apply. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, restoring the appeal for fresh adjudication. The Revenue&#039;s objections were allowed, and the appeal was remanded to the CIT(A) for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 06:50:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 180 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the proviso to section 147 could only be invoked if the assessment was reopened after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. As the assessment in this case was reopened within four years, the proviso did not apply. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, restoring the appeal for fresh adjudication. The Revenue&#039;s objections were allowed, and the appeal was remanded to the CIT(A) for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>