<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the estimated profit rate to 8% for a construction business, deleted disallowances under sections 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3), and rejected additions based on unexplained credits, negative cash balances, and unaccounted investments. Protective additions were also deleted where income was substantively assessed elsewhere, consistently favoring the assessee in various appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 06:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the estimated profit rate to 8% for a construction business, deleted disallowances under sections 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3), and rejected additions based on unexplained credits, negative cash balances, and unaccounted investments. Protective additions were also deleted where income was substantively assessed elsewhere, consistently favoring the assessee in various appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>