<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 163 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant concerning the eligibility of CENVAT credit on certain items used for fabricating support structures, setting aside the demand of duty for the extended period and the penalty while upholding the demand for the normal period. The decision highlighted the importance of disclosing relevant information to avoid contravention of rules and considered conflicting decisions on similar matters, ultimately providing clarity on the disputed issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 06:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 163 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant concerning the eligibility of CENVAT credit on certain items used for fabricating support structures, setting aside the demand of duty for the extended period and the penalty while upholding the demand for the normal period. The decision highlighted the importance of disclosing relevant information to avoid contravention of rules and considered conflicting decisions on similar matters, ultimately providing clarity on the disputed issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>