https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244680 The appeals challenging the dismissal of writ petitions seeking cross-examination before the Adjudicating Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, were dismissed. The court upheld the Single Judge's decision, emphasizing the importance of allowing statutory remedies and avoiding premature interference in ongoing proceedings. The court highlighted the burden of proof on the accused, the importance of natural justice, and the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction. The decision protected the rights of the appellants, finding no demonstrated prejudice suffered by them. en-us Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244680 The appeals challenging the dismissal of writ petitions seeking cross-examination before the Adjudicating Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, were dismissed. The court upheld the Single Judge's decision, emphasizing the importance of allowing statutory remedies and avoiding premature interference in ongoing proceedings. The court highlighted the burden of proof on the accused, the importance of natural justice, and the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction. The decision protected the rights of the appellants, finding no demonstrated prejudice suffered by them. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244680