<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 130 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s actions in passing an order under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 after six months from the initial order, rectifying errors apparent on the record, and reducing duty demand were justified. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld in favor of the respondent-assessee, dismissing the appeal with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 130 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s actions in passing an order under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 after six months from the initial order, rectifying errors apparent on the record, and reducing duty demand were justified. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld in favor of the respondent-assessee, dismissing the appeal with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>