<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 125 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods by the appellants, confirming demands for unpaid excise duty and imposing penalties. Appellant 1 was allowed a reduced penalty of 25% if paid within 30 days. The Tribunal dismissed claims of coercion regarding statements obtained. Penalties and interest were upheld, with Appellant 1 benefiting from the reduced penalty. The judgment was pronounced on 28.02.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:52:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 125 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods by the appellants, confirming demands for unpaid excise duty and imposing penalties. Appellant 1 was allowed a reduced penalty of 25% if paid within 30 days. The Tribunal dismissed claims of coercion regarding statements obtained. Penalties and interest were upheld, with Appellant 1 benefiting from the reduced penalty. The judgment was pronounced on 28.02.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>