<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 112 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244655</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in both issues, emphasizing the lack of incriminating material and justification for the additions made by the AO. The judgment highlights the importance of evidence and material support in making additions during income tax assessments, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 112 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244655</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in both issues, emphasizing the lack of incriminating material and justification for the additions made by the AO. The judgment highlights the importance of evidence and material support in making additions during income tax assessments, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>