https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244629 The Tribunal found that the appellant did not have a strong prima facie case likely to result in full exoneration in a case involving mis-declaration of Stainless Steel Billets, under-valuation of the billets, and wrong availment of Modvat Credit. As a result, the Tribunal did not grant a total waiver of pre-deposit and directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 3 Crore within eight weeks to maintain the appeal, citing serious allegations of duty evasion and fraud necessitating the deposit to safeguard the Revenue's interests. en-us Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 13:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244629 The Tribunal found that the appellant did not have a strong prima facie case likely to result in full exoneration in a case involving mis-declaration of Stainless Steel Billets, under-valuation of the billets, and wrong availment of Modvat Credit. As a result, the Tribunal did not grant a total waiver of pre-deposit and directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 3 Crore within eight weeks to maintain the appeal, citing serious allegations of duty evasion and fraud necessitating the deposit to safeguard the Revenue's interests. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244629