https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162567 Preventive detention is valid where the Detaining Authority records reasoned subjective satisfaction on relevant material that a person already in custody is likely to be released on bail and may resume prejudicial activity. The Court found that the authority knew the detenu was in custody, noted an earlier withdrawn bail petition, considered bail being granted in similar cases, and specifically recorded reasons for apprehending release and preventing further smuggling. The detention order was therefore not vitiated for want of application of mind, and the challenge to the likelihood of release on bail failed. en-us Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162567 Preventive detention is valid where the Detaining Authority records reasoned subjective satisfaction on relevant material that a person already in custody is likely to be released on bail and may resume prejudicial activity. The Court found that the authority knew the detenu was in custody, noted an earlier withdrawn bail petition, considered bail being granted in similar cases, and specifically recorded reasons for apprehending release and preventing further smuggling. The detention order was therefore not vitiated for want of application of mind, and the challenge to the likelihood of release on bail failed. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162567