https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162566 In preventive detention matters, non-consideration of a detenu's representation will not vitiate the detention order where the records show the representations were received and considered, and no prejudice is established. Subjective satisfaction on the likelihood of release on bail must rest on relevant material, not mere ipse dixit; reliance on similar cases where bail was granted can support that assessment. Detention may also be sustained where the material shows activities prejudicial to public order. On these facts, the detention was upheld because the representations were substantively considered and the authority's satisfaction on bail risk and public-order prejudice was supported by record. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162566 In preventive detention matters, non-consideration of a detenu's representation will not vitiate the detention order where the records show the representations were received and considered, and no prejudice is established. Subjective satisfaction on the likelihood of release on bail must rest on relevant material, not mere ipse dixit; reliance on similar cases where bail was granted can support that assessment. Detention may also be sustained where the material shows activities prejudicial to public order. On these facts, the detention was upheld because the representations were substantively considered and the authority's satisfaction on bail risk and public-order prejudice was supported by record. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162566