<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 926 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162559</link>
    <description>A personal search carried out together with recovery from shoulder bags attracted the safeguards applicable to search of the person, so Section 50 of the NDPS Act could not be bypassed by treating the recovery as a mere baggage search. The absence of independent witnesses at the search and seizure stage further weakened the prosecution evidence and added to the doubt about recovery. On these facts, the High Court&#039;s acquittal was upheld and no interference was called for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 926 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162559</link>
      <description>A personal search carried out together with recovery from shoulder bags attracted the safeguards applicable to search of the person, so Section 50 of the NDPS Act could not be bypassed by treating the recovery as a mere baggage search. The absence of independent witnesses at the search and seizure stage further weakened the prosecution evidence and added to the doubt about recovery. On these facts, the High Court&#039;s acquittal was upheld and no interference was called for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>