<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 81 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244624</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 45(3A) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act was discussed as a discretionary provision, with the Court noting prima facie agreement with the Tribunal&#039;s view that penalty need not be mandatory. The Court also distinguished the discretion not to impose penalty from the separate question whether any penalty, once imposed, can be reduced below the statutory minimum. However, it declined to give a final ruling on whether the provision is mandatory and left that issue open for consideration in an appropriate case, taking into account that the total reduction involved in the appeals was less than Rs. 35,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 81 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244624</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 45(3A) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act was discussed as a discretionary provision, with the Court noting prima facie agreement with the Tribunal&#039;s view that penalty need not be mandatory. The Court also distinguished the discretion not to impose penalty from the separate question whether any penalty, once imposed, can be reduced below the statutory minimum. However, it declined to give a final ruling on whether the provision is mandatory and left that issue open for consideration in an appropriate case, taking into account that the total reduction involved in the appeals was less than Rs. 35,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>