<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 77 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision disallowing Cenvat Credit to the appellant due to discrepancies in invoices mentioning the old name and address. Despite the discrepancies, the Tribunal found the receipt of taxable services during the disputed period was not in question, noting the appellant&#039;s name and address change with official approval. The denial of credit based solely on old invoices was deemed unjustified, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit requirements and staying of recovery, in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:20:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 77 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision disallowing Cenvat Credit to the appellant due to discrepancies in invoices mentioning the old name and address. Despite the discrepancies, the Tribunal found the receipt of taxable services during the disputed period was not in question, noting the appellant&#039;s name and address change with official approval. The denial of credit based solely on old invoices was deemed unjustified, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit requirements and staying of recovery, in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>