<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 72 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244615</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of unexplained expenditure on visa processing and consulate fees under section 69C of the IT Act for A.Y. 2007-08. The CIT(A) allowed additional evidence submission by the assessee, which revealed no discrepancy in expenses, leading to the deletion of the addition. The ITAT found the admission of additional evidence justified and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:19:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 72 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244615</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of unexplained expenditure on visa processing and consulate fees under section 69C of the IT Act for A.Y. 2007-08. The CIT(A) allowed additional evidence submission by the assessee, which revealed no discrepancy in expenses, leading to the deletion of the addition. The ITAT found the admission of additional evidence justified and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>