<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 70 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244613</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the appeal of an assessee-company regarding disallowance of transport expenses and valuation of closing stock. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to re-examine the disallowed transport expenses issue with fresh evidence as the appellant had provided a Xerox copy of the TDS certificate. Additionally, the ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant on the valuation of closing stock, noting the discrepancy in valuation rates and supporting the appellant&#039;s use of the FIFO method. The First Appeal Authority&#039;s decision was reversed, and the ITAT instructed a re-evaluation of both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:19:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 70 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244613</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the appeal of an assessee-company regarding disallowance of transport expenses and valuation of closing stock. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to re-examine the disallowed transport expenses issue with fresh evidence as the appellant had provided a Xerox copy of the TDS certificate. Additionally, the ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant on the valuation of closing stock, noting the discrepancy in valuation rates and supporting the appellant&#039;s use of the FIFO method. The First Appeal Authority&#039;s decision was reversed, and the ITAT instructed a re-evaluation of both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>