https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244599 Where a personal search is conducted under the NDPS Act, compliance with Section 50 is mandatory, and prior specific intelligence also attracts the safeguards under Sections 41 and 42. The prosecution case was further weakened by inconsistencies in the Section 50 notice, doubts about later preparation of documents, lack of specific authorisation for the seizing officer, and serious defects in the Section 67 material, public witnesses, site plan, seal and mobile-phone certification. On these cumulative defects, the record did not justify interference with the acquittal, and leave to appeal was declined. en-us Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:18:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244599 Where a personal search is conducted under the NDPS Act, compliance with Section 50 is mandatory, and prior specific intelligence also attracts the safeguards under Sections 41 and 42. The prosecution case was further weakened by inconsistencies in the Section 50 notice, doubts about later preparation of documents, lack of specific authorisation for the seizing officer, and serious defects in the Section 67 material, public witnesses, site plan, seal and mobile-phone certification. On these cumulative defects, the record did not justify interference with the acquittal, and leave to appeal was declined. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244599