<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 451 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162554</link>
    <description>Penalty could not be demanded at the detention stage without separate proceedings for its imposition, as a detention notice cannot itself sustain a penalty levy at twice the tax amount. The vehicle and goods were directed to be released on payment of the tax indicated in the demand notice, while the authorities were left free to initiate appropriate penalty proceedings in accordance with law if warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 17:14:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 451 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162554</link>
      <description>Penalty could not be demanded at the detention stage without separate proceedings for its imposition, as a detention notice cannot itself sustain a penalty levy at twice the tax amount. The vehicle and goods were directed to be released on payment of the tax indicated in the demand notice, while the authorities were left free to initiate appropriate penalty proceedings in accordance with law if warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>