https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162544 The High Court intervened in the case due to perceived carelessness in passing assessment orders. The court found that the assessing officer did not properly consider objections raised by the petitioners and based the assessment solely on a proposal from enforcement officials. Consequently, the assessment orders were set aside, and the assessing officer was directed to reconsider the objections and provide valid reasons for their decision. The matters were remitted back to the assessing authority to re-frame the assessment in accordance with the law, with no costs imposed on the parties. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:06:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162544 The High Court intervened in the case due to perceived carelessness in passing assessment orders. The court found that the assessing officer did not properly consider objections raised by the petitioners and based the assessment solely on a proposal from enforcement officials. Consequently, the assessment orders were set aside, and the assessing officer was directed to reconsider the objections and provide valid reasons for their decision. The matters were remitted back to the assessing authority to re-frame the assessment in accordance with the law, with no costs imposed on the parties. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162544