<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 26 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244569</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the Assessee&#039;s deduction under section 54F for investment in a new residential property. The Tribunal affirmed that the Assessee met the conditions specified in the section, including the eligibility of investments made before the sale of the original asset. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the Assessee was entitled to the deduction as per the law&#039;s interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:28:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 26 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244569</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the Assessee&#039;s deduction under section 54F for investment in a new residential property. The Tribunal affirmed that the Assessee met the conditions specified in the section, including the eligibility of investments made before the sale of the original asset. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the Assessee was entitled to the deduction as per the law&#039;s interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>