<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 20 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) should not be considered as deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. It clarified that the provisions only apply to shareholders, not concerns where the shareholder has a substantial interest. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order and aligning with established judicial precedents and Tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 20 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that Inter-Corporate Deposits (ICDs) should not be considered as deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. It clarified that the provisions only apply to shareholders, not concerns where the shareholder has a substantial interest. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order and aligning with established judicial precedents and Tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>