<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 19 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244562</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals. The additions for deemed dividend, interest on loans to sister concern, and bogus purchases were confirmed. The CIT(A) and ITAT provided detailed reasoning for their decisions, emphasizing the applicability of relevant provisions under the IT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 19 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244562</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals. The additions for deemed dividend, interest on loans to sister concern, and bogus purchases were confirmed. The CIT(A) and ITAT provided detailed reasoning for their decisions, emphasizing the applicability of relevant provisions under the IT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>