<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 533 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162518</link>
    <description>Additions based on third-party gate passes were held unsustainable because, once the assessee denied the transactions, the Revenue had to prove the documents&#039; authenticity and the assessee&#039;s nexus with them. The supporting Mandi Samiti material was not confronted to the assessee, and the authorities had not examined whether the relevant stock records were required to be maintained or whether gate pass entries had to be reflected in them. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh assessment with proper enquiry and opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:43:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 533 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162518</link>
      <description>Additions based on third-party gate passes were held unsustainable because, once the assessee denied the transactions, the Revenue had to prove the documents&#039; authenticity and the assessee&#039;s nexus with them. The supporting Mandi Samiti material was not confronted to the assessee, and the authorities had not examined whether the relevant stock records were required to be maintained or whether gate pass entries had to be reflected in them. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh assessment with proper enquiry and opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>