<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 450 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162509</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that penalties under sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 should not have been imposed on the appellant for not paying service tax on taxable services, as the appellant demonstrated reasonable cause for the delay in payment. The Tribunal cited relevant case law and set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 450 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162509</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that penalties under sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 should not have been imposed on the appellant for not paying service tax on taxable services, as the appellant demonstrated reasonable cause for the delay in payment. The Tribunal cited relevant case law and set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>